Week 3 Outline

1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.

I will start by describing the situation that every popular music is censored by government before they are played by mass media. Then I will shift attention to whether this censorship is appropriate. I will end with my thesis, "Government should not censor all music with violent or explicit lyrics."

2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.

I will summarize the research I've done and provide an explanation for why I think that the censorship is unnecessary. I will give a brief history of the music censorship in Korea, especially in 1970s - 1980s

3. The confirmation,which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.

I will start by emphasizing the importance of the freedom of expression. I will argue that musicians express their thoughts and feelings through their music. I will describe the problem which can caused by misuse of this censorship.

4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.

I will concede that violent or explicit lyrics are bad for children's emotion, but It can be solved by parent or teachers' education. Then I will emphasize that most of us do not take the contents as real when we watch violent or explicit movies or dramas, and music is also another form of art.

5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument, and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.

I will close with a summary of my previous points, then a brief consideration of the situation that musicians cannot freely express what they feel because of censorship. I will end with a reaffirmation of my original thesis.